PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTP vs. PBTP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTP vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than PBTP's 2.15% return.


VTP

1D
-0.16%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
1.55%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PBTP

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.14%
1Y
4.68%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
3.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTP vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTP and PBTP is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTP vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTP

PBTP
PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTP vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VTP vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTPPBTPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Drawdowns

VTP vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum PBTP drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and PBTP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTPPBTPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-5.44%

+3.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.02%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-0.75%

+0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.19%

Volatility

VTP vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTPPBTPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.26%

1.54%

+1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.26%

2.85%

+0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.26%

2.64%

+0.62%

VTP vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTP vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than PBTP's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PBTP
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
3.10%3.82%2.59%2.36%5.33%3.12%1.25%2.12%2.33%0.73%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
1.61%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTP and PBTP have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for PBTP.

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.

VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while PBTP tracks ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.07% for PBTP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTP and PBTP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer