VTP vs. LQDI
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and LQDI (iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. VTP is passively managed, while LQDI is actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for LQDI.
Performance
VTP vs. LQDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly lower than LQDI's 1.45% return.
VTP
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDI
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
VTP vs. LQDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.10% | 2.46% |
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 1.45% | 3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and LQDI is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. LQDI — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDI
VTP vs. LQDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTP | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.85 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.54 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTP vs. LQDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum LQDI drawdown of -28.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and LQDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -28.99% | +27.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.66% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -5.22% | +4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.96% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. LQDI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | LQDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 4.96% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 8.14% | -4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.35% | 10.81% | -7.46% |
VTP vs. LQDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDI's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. LQDI - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than LQDI's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDI iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 4.59% | 4.46% | 4.65% | 3.98% | 3.27% | 2.42% | 2.34% | 3.26% | 2.53% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.62% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and LQDI have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for LQDI.
LQDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.62% for VTP.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.18% for LQDI.
Find the right allocation for VTP and LQDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer