PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTP vs. DFIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTP vs. DFIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with VTP at 0.90% and DFIP at 0.90%.


VTP

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.58%
YTD
0.90%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFIP

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.51%
YTD
0.90%
1Y
3.19%
3Y*
3.98%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTP vs. DFIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTP and DFIP is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.96

The correlation between VTP and DFIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTP vs. DFIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTP
VTP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIP
DFIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
DFIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTP vs. DFIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTPDFIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

1.56

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

4.42

+0.44

VTP vs. DFIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTP Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the DFIP Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTP and DFIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTP vs. DFIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum DFIP drawdown of -14.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and DFIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTPDFIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.92%

-14.96%

+13.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.92%

-2.06%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-1.04%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-6.81%

+6.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.72%

-0.05%

Volatility

VTP vs. DFIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) is 1.19%, while Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (DFIP) has a volatility of 1.29%. This indicates that VTP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTPDFIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

1.29%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.48%

2.59%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.36%

3.53%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.35%

6.76%

-3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.35%

6.76%

-3.41%

VTP vs. DFIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIP's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTP vs. DFIP - Dividend Comparison

VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than DFIP's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFIP
Dimensional Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
4.66%4.70%3.69%3.68%5.97%0.56%
VTP
Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF
2.98%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTP and DFIP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFIP has higher volatility (1.29%) compared to VTP (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTP dropped -1.92% vs DFIP's -14.96%.

On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 3.27% vs 3.19% for DFIP. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 3.27% return vs 3.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for DFIP.

DFIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.66%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.11% for DFIP.

VTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTP and DFIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer