VTP vs. CSHP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and CSHP (iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while CSHP is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. VTP is passively managed, while CSHP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for CSHP.

Performance

VTP vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than CSHP's 1.62% return.

VTP

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHP

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.24%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 3.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTP vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	1.51%	2.27%
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	1.62%	1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between VTP and CSHP is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

VTP vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHP

CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 100
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTP vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTP	CSHP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	11.82	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	10.70	-9.41

Drawdowns

VTP vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and CSHP.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTP	CSHP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.92%	-0.08%	-1.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.34%	-0.02%	-0.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.52%	-0.00%	-0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VTP	CSHP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.26%	0.33%	+2.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.26%	0.40%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.26%	0.40%	+2.86%

VTP vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTP vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than CSHP's 3.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CSHP iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF	3.92%	5.39%	1.96%
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	1.61%	1.56%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTP and CSHP in my portfolio?

VTP and CSHP have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VTP or CSHP?

On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTP or CSHP?

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CSHP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTP or CSHP?

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.92%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.

What is the main difference between VTP and CSHP?

VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.20% for CSHP.