PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTMSX vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTMSX vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTMSX achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VTMSX has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.79%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


VTMSX

1D
0.92%
1M
2.71%
YTD
16.65%
6M
15.43%
1Y
32.94%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
10.79%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTMSX vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
16.65%5.93%8.61%15.95%-16.16%27.08%11.05%23.28%-8.62%13.05%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VTMSX and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.82

The correlation between VTMSX and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTMSX vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTMSX
VOO

Financial Services

16.7%
11.6%

Industrials

15.6%
8.3%

Technology

15.4%
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

13.4%
10.2%

Healthcare

10.9%
8.5%

Real Estate

7.8%
1.9%

Energy

6.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

5.3%
1.8%

Communication Services

3.5%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.9%

Utilities

1.9%
2.4%

Financial Services

VTMSX
16.7%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

VTMSX
15.6%
VOO
8.3%

Technology

VTMSX
15.4%
VOO
35.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTMSX
13.4%
VOO
10.2%

Healthcare

VTMSX
10.9%
VOO
8.5%

Real Estate

VTMSX
7.8%
VOO
1.9%

Energy

VTMSX
6.0%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

VTMSX
5.3%
VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

VTMSX
3.5%
VOO
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

VTMSX
3.5%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

VTMSX
1.9%
VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTMSX vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTMSX
VTMSX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VTMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTMSX vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMSXVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

3.16

+0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

14.73

-1.11

VTMSX vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTMSX and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMSXVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

2.39

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.83

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.87

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.89

-0.43

Drawdowns

VTMSX vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTMSX drawdown since its inception was -57.84%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTMSX and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMSXVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.84%

-33.99%

-23.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-8.90%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.93%

-18.69%

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.93%

-24.52%

-3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.88%

-33.99%

-9.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-3.69%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.58%

1.91%

+0.67%

Volatility

VTMSX vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares (VTMSX) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that VTMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMSXVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

2.84%

+1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

8.90%

+2.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

11.80%

+5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.46%

16.81%

+4.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

18.01%

+5.11%

VTMSX vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTMSX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTMSX vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

VTMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%
VTMSX
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small-Cap Fund Admiral Shares
1.15%1.28%1.44%1.50%1.51%1.16%1.09%1.15%1.26%1.11%1.01%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTMSX and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTMSX has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTMSX dropped -57.84% vs VOO's -33.99%.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTMSX and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer