PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTIVX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTIVX achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 12.26% return.


VTIVX

1D
1.74%
1M
-0.47%
6M
6.16%
YTD
9.10%
1Y
19.82%
3Y*
15.57%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
10.82%
ALL TIME*
8.82%

FQLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.35%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
9.10%20.01%13.68%19.72%-17.38%16.16%16.31%24.94%-7.89%7.65%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
12.26%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIVX and FQLSX is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.98

The correlation between VTIVX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTIVX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTIVX
VTIVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VTIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIVXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

2.42

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.20

10.10

-0.90

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIVX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIVX drawdown since its inception was -51.69%, which is greater than FQLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIVX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIVXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.69%

-31.26%

-20.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.30%

-9.48%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.40%

-15.37%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.10%

-27.41%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-2.17%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-5.36%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.27%

-0.28%

Volatility

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund (VTIVX) is 3.46%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that VTIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIVXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

4.40%

-0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

12.17%

-2.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

14.19%

-2.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.64%

15.36%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

16.12%

-1.37%

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTIVX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

VTIVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.66%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%0.00%0.00%
VTIVX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2045 Fund
2.29%2.50%2.36%2.27%2.75%15.40%1.90%2.23%2.52%0.04%2.47%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VTIVX and FQLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VTIVX (3.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIVX dropped -51.69% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTIVX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer