VTIP vs. LQDH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while LQDH is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. VTIP is passively managed, while LQDH is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTIP returned 3.14%/yr vs 4.65%/yr for LQDH. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTIP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LQDH.

Performance

VTIP vs. LQDH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTIP achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than LQDH's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, VTIP has underperformed LQDH with an annualized return of 3.14%, while LQDH has yielded a comparatively higher 4.65% annualized return.

VTIP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.04%
• YTD: 2.05%
• 6M: 2.11%
• 1Y: 4.63%
• 3Y*: 5.26%
• 5Y*: 3.39%
• 10Y*: 3.14%

LQDH

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 3.24%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: 8.11%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: 4.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTIP vs. LQDH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	2.05%	6.07%	4.74%	4.62%	-2.94%	5.36%	4.95%	4.86%	0.56%	0.82%
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	2.40%	7.00%	7.43%	11.14%	-1.88%	1.84%	1.68%	9.50%	-2.20%	6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between VTIP and LQDH is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014	0.06

The correlation between VTIP and LQDH shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

VTIP vs. LQDH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTIP

VTIP Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
VTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
VTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

LQDH

LQDH Risk / Return Rank: 82
LQDH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
LQDH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
LQDH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LQDH Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
LQDH Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTIP vs. LQDH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VTIP	LQDH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	2.90	+0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.28	4.40	+0.87
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.65	1.58	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.54	3.47	+3.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.31	14.76	+10.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VTIP vs. LQDH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the LQDH Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTIP and LQDH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VTIP	LQDH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.10	2.90	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.23	1.21	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.15	0.72	+0.43
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	0.59	+0.31

Drawdowns

VTIP vs. LQDH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, smaller than the maximum LQDH drawdown of -24.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and LQDH.

Drawdown Indicators

	VTIP	LQDH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.27%	-24.63%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.70%	-2.34%	+1.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.98%	-4.86%	+3.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-5.50%	-7.08%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-6.27%	-24.63%	+18.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	0.00%	-0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.04%	-1.68%	+0.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.55%	-0.37%

Volatility

VTIP vs. LQDH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is 0.43%, while iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that VTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VTIP	LQDH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.43%	0.48%	-0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.03%	2.03%	-1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.50%	2.72%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.78%	4.41%	-1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.74%	6.44%	-3.70%

VTIP vs. LQDH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than LQDH's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VTIP vs. LQDH - Dividend Comparison

VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than LQDH's 6.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF	6.47%	6.06%	7.57%	7.69%	3.73%	1.65%	2.22%	3.09%	5.08%	2.37%	2.33%	2.98%
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	3.58%	3.81%	2.70%	2.86%	6.84%	4.68%	1.20%	1.95%	2.45%	1.52%	0.76%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VTIP and LQDH in my portfolio?

VTIP and LQDH have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VTIP or LQDH?

LQDH has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to VTIP (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs LQDH's -24.63%.

Which ETF is better, VTIP or LQDH?

On 10-year performance, LQDH leads with 4.65% vs 3.14% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VTIP or LQDH?

Over the 10-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VTIP or LQDH?

VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VTIP or LQDH?

LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 6.47%, compared with 3.58% for VTIP.

What is the main difference between VTIP and LQDH?

VTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while LQDH is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTIP and 0.25% for LQDH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.