VTI vs. UTES
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and UTES (Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while UTES is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Virtus Investment Partners. VTI is passively managed, while UTES is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.02%/yr vs 12.27%/yr for UTES. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for UTES.
Performance
VTI vs. UTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 9.62% return, which is significantly higher than UTES's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, VTI has outperformed UTES with an annualized return of 15.02%, while UTES has yielded a comparatively lower 12.27% annualized return.
VTI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 9.62%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 24.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.60%
- 5Y*
- 12.20%
- 10Y*
- 15.02%
UTES
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.26%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 8.31%
- 3Y*
- 22.00%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
VTI vs. UTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 9.62% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 0.26% | 25.71% | 45.35% | -2.46% | 0.80% | 20.74% | -0.30% | 25.48% | 5.14% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and UTES is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015 | 0.37 |
VTI vs. UTES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
UTES
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Technology
VTI
UTES
-
Financial Services
VTI
UTES
-
Communication Services
VTI
UTES
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
UTES
-
Industrials
VTI
UTES
-
Healthcare
VTI
UTES
-
Consumer Defensive
VTI
UTES
-
Energy
VTI
UTES
-
Real Estate
VTI
UTES
-
Utilities
VTI
UTES
Basic Materials
VTI
UTES
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. UTES — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
UTES
VTI vs. UTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.08 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 0.60 | +2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.52 | 1.32 | +11.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. UTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than UTES's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and UTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -35.39% | -20.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -13.88% | +4.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -17.62% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -20.40% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -35.39% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -9.10% | +6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -5.53% | -2.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 6.29% | -4.30% |
Volatility
VTI vs. UTES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.50%, while Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF (UTES) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | UTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 7.23% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 17.05% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.64% | 21.32% | -8.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.47% | 20.62% | -3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 20.17% | -1.84% |
VTI vs. UTES - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UTES's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. UTES - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than UTES's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UTES Virtus Reaves Utilities ETF | 1.49% | 1.42% | 1.51% | 2.44% | 2.13% | 1.94% | 2.09% | 1.84% | 2.09% | 3.44% | 3.53% | 0.61% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and UTES have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UTES has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to VTI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs UTES's -35.39%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.02% vs 12.27% for UTES. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.02% return vs 12.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for UTES.
UTES has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.03% for VTI.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UTES is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Virtus Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.49% for UTES.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and UTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer