VTI vs. UC67.L
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and UC67.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VTI tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index while UC67.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 14.71%/yr vs 14.88%/yr for UC67.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for UC67.L.
Performance
VTI vs. UC67.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than UC67.L's 10.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTI having a 14.71% annualized return and UC67.L not far ahead at 14.88%.
VTI
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.29%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.08%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 14.71%
UC67.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 10.42%
- 1Y
- 26.89%
- 3Y*
- 22.02%
- 5Y*
- 13.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.88%
VTI vs. UC67.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.72% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 10.29% | 17.07% | 24.74% | 27.16% | -20.11% | 27.17% | 20.28% | 30.31% | -5.96% | 21.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and UC67.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between VTI and UC67.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTI vs. UC67.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
UC67.L
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
UC67.L
Financial Services
VTI
UC67.L
Communication Services
VTI
UC67.L
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
UC67.L
Industrials
VTI
UC67.L
Healthcare
VTI
UC67.L
Consumer Defensive
VTI
UC67.L
Energy
VTI
UC67.L
Real Estate
VTI
UC67.L
Utilities
VTI
UC67.L
Basic Materials
VTI
UC67.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. UC67.L — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
UC67.L
VTI vs. UC67.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTI | UC67.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.93 | 3.17 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.45 | 13.61 | -0.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTI | UC67.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.33 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.81 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.90 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.81 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
VTI vs. UC67.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than UC67.L's maximum drawdown of -34.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and UC67.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | UC67.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -34.42% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -8.57% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -19.42% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -25.45% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -34.42% | -0.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -0.50% | -2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -4.44% | -3.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.00% | -0.06% |
Volatility
VTI vs. UC67.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UC67.L) at 3.27%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UC67.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | UC67.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.27% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 8.55% | +1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 11.66% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.44% | 16.31% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 16.53% | +1.79% |
VTI vs. UC67.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than UC67.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTI vs. UC67.L - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than UC67.L's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UC67.L UBS ETF (LU) MSCI USA UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.58% | 0.62% | 0.76% | 0.89% | 1.04% | 0.75% | 1.01% | 1.14% | 1.25% | 0.58% | 1.26% | 1.28% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and UC67.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for UC67.L.
VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while UC67.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.14% for UC67.L.
Find the right allocation for VTI and UC67.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer