PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTI vs. BINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTI vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.29% return.


VTI

1D
1.68%
1M
2.70%
YTD
11.46%
6M
11.76%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
20.94%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
15.23%

BINC

1D
0.15%
1M
0.92%
YTD
1.29%
6M
1.78%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
7.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTI vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.46%17.10%23.81%15.37%
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
1.29%7.57%5.76%7.12%

Correlation

The correlation between VTI and BINC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2023

0.46

The correlation between VTI and BINC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTI vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BINC
BINC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTI vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIBINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.52

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

2.20

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

8.60

+5.74

VTI vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTI Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTI and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTI vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and BINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIBINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-2.69%

-52.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-2.69%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-2.69%

-16.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.10%

-0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-0.36%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

0.69%

+1.29%

Volatility

VTI vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that VTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIBINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

0.75%

+3.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

1.87%

+8.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

2.30%

+10.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

2.99%

+14.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.34%

2.99%

+15.35%

VTI vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTI vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than BINC's 5.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
5.84%5.86%6.14%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTI and BINC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs BINC's -2.69%.

On 3-year performance, VTI leads with 20.94% vs 7.04% for BINC. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTI has performed better with a 20.94% return vs 7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BINC.

BINC has the higher dividend yield at 5.84%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.40% for BINC.

BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTI and BINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer