PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHRX vs. NFIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHRX achieves a 7.80% return, which is significantly higher than NFIAX's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VTHRX has outperformed NFIAX with an annualized return of 8.89%, while NFIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.


VTHRX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.00%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.65%
1Y
19.60%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
8.89%

NFIAX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.92%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
7.85%
5Y*
5.00%
10Y*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
7.80%16.25%10.43%16.24%-16.28%11.37%14.11%21.08%-5.85%15.24%
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
1.37%5.83%8.89%10.92%-3.26%4.27%3.63%8.31%-1.13%3.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHRX and NFIAX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2009

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHRX vs. NFIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHRX
VTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NFIAX
NFIAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
NFIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
NFIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) and Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRXNFIAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

2.44

+0.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.54

6.22

-2.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

2.00

-0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

5.60

-2.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.41

19.35

-5.94

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the NFIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHRX and NFIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRXNFIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.44

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.87

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

1.13

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

1.25

-0.75

Drawdowns

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHRX drawdown since its inception was -49.57%, which is greater than NFIAX's maximum drawdown of -22.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHRX and NFIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRXNFIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.57%

-22.18%

-27.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.56%

-1.07%

-5.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.64%

-2.19%

-7.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.75%

-6.84%

-15.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

-22.18%

-2.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.11%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.19%

-0.83%

-5.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

0.31%

+1.18%

Volatility

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund (NFIAX) at 0.59%. This indicates that VTHRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRXNFIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

0.59%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.53%

1.65%

+4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09%

2.19%

+5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

2.69%

+7.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.26%

4.02%

+7.24%

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHRX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NFIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTHRX vs. NFIAX - Dividend Comparison

VTHRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, less than NFIAX's 6.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NFIAX
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund
6.59%6.84%8.05%6.89%3.97%3.36%3.68%4.71%4.32%3.44%3.46%4.05%
VTHRX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2030 Fund
3.74%4.03%3.63%2.59%2.53%17.56%2.56%2.38%2.71%0.06%2.38%3.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTHRX and NFIAX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTHRX has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to NFIAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHRX dropped -49.57% vs NFIAX's -22.18%.

VTHRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHRX and NFIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer