PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTG vs. IBTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTG vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.50% return.


VTG

1D
0.11%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.01%
6M
0.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBTM

1D
-0.18%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.50%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
3.93%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTG vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTG and IBTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.96

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTG vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTG

IBTM
IBTM Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IBTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTG vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VTG vs. IBTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTGIBTMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.20

+0.72

Drawdowns

VTG vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and IBTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTGIBTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.89%

-13.60%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.38%

+0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.74%

-4.82%

+4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

Volatility

VTG vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTGIBTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.51%

4.09%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.51%

7.56%

-4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.51%

7.56%

-4.05%

VTG vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTG vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison

VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
IBTM
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF
3.95%3.87%3.96%3.39%1.38%
VTG
Vanguard Total Treasury ETF
3.20%1.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VTG and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.

IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.

VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while IBTM tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.07% for IBTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTG and IBTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer