VTG vs. IBTM
VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds - VTG tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index while IBTM tracks the ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
VTG vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.50% return.
VTG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -0.50%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 2.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTG vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 2.88% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.50% | 3.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTG and IBTM is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.96 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTG vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
VTG
IBTM
VTG vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.96 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.20 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
VTG vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -13.60% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -2.38% | +0.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -4.82% | +4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.12% | — |
Volatility
VTG vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTG | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 4.09% | -0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 7.56% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 7.56% | -4.05% |
VTG vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTG vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VTG and IBTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.
IBTM has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.
VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while IBTM tracks ICE 2032 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for VTG and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer