PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTES vs. FMUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTES vs. FMUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTES achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than FMUN's 1.69% return.


VTES

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*

FMUN

1D
0.03%
1M
0.93%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.24%
1Y
7.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTES vs. FMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTES and FMUN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2025

0.55

The correlation between VTES and FMUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTES vs. FMUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTES
VTES Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTES Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FMUN
FMUN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FMUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FMUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMUN Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTES vs. FMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTESFMUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

2.45

+0.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

3.54

+0.72

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.53

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.38

+0.10

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

7.88

-0.52

VTES vs. FMUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTES Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the FMUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTES and FMUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTESFMUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.45

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

1.28

+0.53

Drawdowns

VTES vs. FMUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTES drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, smaller than the maximum FMUN drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTES and FMUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTESFMUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-3.21%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-3.21%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.66%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-0.82%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.97%

-0.48%

Volatility

VTES vs. FMUN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) is 0.35%, while Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF (FMUN) has a volatility of 1.27%. This indicates that VTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTESFMUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

1.27%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

2.27%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

3.12%

-1.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.72%

4.06%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.72%

4.06%

-2.34%

VTES vs. FMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTES has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than FMUN's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTES vs. FMUN - Dividend Comparison

VTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than FMUN's 3.29% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FMUN
Fidelity Systematic Municipal Bond Index ETF
3.29%2.41%0.00%0.00%
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares
2.75%2.77%2.99%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTES and FMUN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FMUN has higher volatility (1.27%) compared to VTES (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTES dropped -2.42% vs FMUN's -3.21%.

On 1-year performance, FMUN leads with 7.61% vs 3.63% for VTES. On fees, FMUN is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VTES has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FMUN has performed better with a 7.61% return vs 3.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FMUN is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VTES.

FMUN has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 2.75% for VTES.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTES and 0.05% for FMUN.

VTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTES and FMUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer