PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEL vs. PUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEL vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTEL achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than PUSH's 1.27% return.


VTEL

1D
0.21%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.25%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PUSH

1D
0.10%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.61%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEL vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTEL and PUSH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2025

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEL vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEL
VTEL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VTEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PUSH
PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEL vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTELPUSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

2.51

-0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

3.80

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.70

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

7.65

-5.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.23

19.05

-9.82

VTEL vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTEL Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTEL and PUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTELPUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.51

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.26

2.90

-0.64

Drawdowns

VTEL vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEL drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEL and PUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTELPUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-0.85%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-0.50%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-0.11%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.20%

+0.70%

Volatility

VTEL vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) has a higher volatility of 1.26% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.31%. This indicates that VTEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTELPUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

0.31%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

0.98%

+1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

1.52%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

1.30%

+2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

1.30%

+2.47%

VTEL vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTEL vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

VTEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than PUSH's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
3.24%3.45%1.86%
VTEL
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.81%2.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTEL and PUSH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTEL has higher volatility (1.26%) compared to PUSH (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTEL dropped -3.22% vs PUSH's -0.85%.

On 1-year performance, VTEL leads with 8.64% vs 3.81% for PUSH. On fees, VTEL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PUSH has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTEL has performed better with a 8.64% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for PUSH.

VTEL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 3.24% for PUSH.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VTEL and 0.15% for PUSH.

PUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEL and PUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer