PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEL vs. IBMM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEL vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VTEL

1D
0.21%
1M
0.68%
YTD
1.88%
6M
2.25%
1Y
8.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBMM

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEL vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEL vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEL
VTEL Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VTEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEL Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEL vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTELIBMMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.23

VTEL vs. IBMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTELIBMMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.26

Drawdowns

VTEL vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEL drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEL and IBMM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTELIBMMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

0.00%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

0.00%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

Volatility

VTEL vs. IBMM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTELIBMMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.75%

0.00%

+3.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.77%

0.00%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.77%

0.00%

+3.77%

VTEL vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTEL vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

VTEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, VTEL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VTEL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IBMM.

VTEL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

VTEL tracks S&P 10+ Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VTEL and 0.18% for IBMM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEL and IBMM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer