PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEC vs. RVNU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEC vs. RVNU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTEC achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly lower than RVNU's 3.71% return.


VTEC

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.98%
6M
1.25%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RVNU

1D
-0.04%
1M
1.38%
YTD
3.71%
6M
3.08%
1Y
9.62%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
-0.23%
10Y*
1.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEC vs. RVNU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTEC and RVNU is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.61

The correlation between VTEC and RVNU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEC vs. RVNU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEC
VTEC Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
VTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

RVNU
RVNU Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
RVNU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RVNU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
RVNU Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
RVNU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RVNU Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEC vs. RVNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) and Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTECRVNUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.39

1.89

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

2.83

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.36

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.92

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.83

11.69

-3.85

VTEC vs. RVNU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the RVNU Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTEC and RVNU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTECRVNUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

1.89

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.39

+0.34

Drawdowns

VTEC vs. RVNU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEC drawdown since its inception was -4.50%, smaller than the maximum RVNU drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEC and RVNU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTECRVNUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-23.51%

+19.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-2.46%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-2.80%

+1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-4.98%

+3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.83%

+0.03%

Volatility

VTEC vs. RVNU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) is 0.86%, while Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF (RVNU) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that VTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RVNU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTECRVNUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

1.42%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.87%

3.41%

-1.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

5.12%

-2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.76%

7.19%

-3.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.76%

7.27%

-3.51%

VTEC vs. RVNU - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than RVNU's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTEC vs. RVNU - Dividend Comparison

VTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than RVNU's 3.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RVNU
Xtrackers Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond ETF
3.52%3.46%3.06%2.79%2.81%2.18%2.43%2.75%2.76%2.49%2.72%3.01%
VTEC
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.16%3.13%2.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTEC and RVNU have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RVNU has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to VTEC (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTEC dropped -4.50% vs RVNU's -23.51%.

On 1-year performance, RVNU leads with 9.62% vs 6.69% for VTEC. On fees, VTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VTEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RVNU has performed better with a 9.62% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for RVNU.

RVNU has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 3.16% for VTEC.

VTEC tracks S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while RVNU tracks Solactive Municipal Infrastructure Revenue Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VTEC and 0.15% for RVNU.

VTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEC and RVNU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer