VTEB vs. ZMUN
VTEB (Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - VTEB tracks the S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index while ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTEB charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTEB achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.59% return.
VTEB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 7.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.88%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.46% | 1.58% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.59% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTEB and ZMUN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTEB vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
VTEB
ZMUN
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEB) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTEB | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.64 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.92 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.65 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTEB | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 6.55 | -6.08 |
Drawdowns
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTEB drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEB and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTEB | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.00% | -0.09% | -16.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | 0.00% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.33% | -0.01% | -2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | — | — |
Volatility
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTEB | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72% | 0.54% | +2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.90% | 0.54% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 0.54% | +4.72% |
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTEB has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTEB vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
VTEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.35% | 3.29% | 3.14% | 2.79% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 1.99% | 2.30% | 2.25% | 1.96% | 1.66% | 0.58% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTEB and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEB is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEB is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
VTEB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
VTEB tracks S&P National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTEB and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for VTEB and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer