PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 16.68% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VT having a 12.29% annualized return and VTV not far ahead at 12.54%.


VT

1D
2.12%
1M
-0.96%
6M
6.58%
YTD
10.86%
1Y
21.10%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
12.29%
ALL TIME*
8.80%

VTV

1D
0.34%
1M
1.20%
6M
11.66%
YTD
16.68%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
12.54%
ALL TIME*
9.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$412.83M$369.31M$481.45M
$702.76M$700.34M$620.98M

VT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
10.86%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
16.68%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VTV is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and VTV has dropped to 0.67 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VTV

Technology

31.2%
15.3%

Financial Services

15.7%
22.4%

Industrials

11.7%
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
3.9%

Healthcare

8.3%
15.2%

Communication Services

7.4%
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
8.7%

Basic Materials

3.8%
3.0%

Energy

3.6%
6.9%

Utilities

2.5%
4.8%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.5%

Technology

VT
31.2%
VTV
15.3%

Financial Services

VT
15.7%
VTV
22.4%

Industrials

VT
11.7%
VTV
14.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.0%
VTV
3.9%

Healthcare

VT
8.3%
VTV
15.2%

Communication Services

VT
7.4%
VTV
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.5%
VTV
8.7%

Basic Materials

VT
3.8%
VTV
3.0%

Energy

VT
3.6%
VTV
6.9%

Utilities

VT
2.5%
VTV
4.8%

Real Estate

VT
2.3%
VTV
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.45

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

4.11

-1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.13

15.92

-6.79

VT vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-59.27%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-6.35%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-14.52%

-1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-17.04%

-9.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-36.78%

+2.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.10%

-1.10%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.97%

-7.82%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

1.65%

+0.67%

Volatility

VT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.01%

2.62%

+1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.68%

7.73%

+3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.97%

10.37%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.22%

13.83%

+2.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.61%

+0.57%

VT vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than VTV's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.60%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.85%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VTV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.54% vs 12.29% for VT. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 12.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 1.60% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer