VT vs. VNQI
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VNQI is a REIT fund tracking the S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 2.74%/yr for VNQI. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VNQI.
Performance
VT vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VNQI with an annualized return of 12.93%, while VNQI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
VNQI
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.85%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- -1.50%
- 10Y*
- 2.74%
VT vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | -0.33% | 21.38% | -2.22% | 6.99% | -22.94% | 5.93% | -7.22% | 21.59% | -9.44% | 26.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and VNQI is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2010 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VT and VNQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VT vs. VNQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
VNQI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
VNQI
Financial Services
VT
VNQI
Industrials
VT
VNQI
Consumer Cyclical
VT
VNQI
Communication Services
VT
VNQI
-
Healthcare
VT
VNQI
Consumer Defensive
VT
VNQI
Energy
VT
VNQI
Basic Materials
VT
VNQI
Utilities
VT
VNQI
Real Estate
VT
VNQI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank
VT
VNQI
VT vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | VNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.09 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 0.40 | +2.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 1.13 | +10.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than VNQI's maximum drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VNQI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | VNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -38.35% | -11.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -14.78% | +5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -16.35% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -35.55% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -38.35% | +4.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -9.99% | +8.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -10.89% | +3.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 5.19% | -2.97% |
Volatility
VT vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) at 4.62%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | VNQI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.62% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 11.75% | -0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 13.73% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 15.54% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.07% | +1.20% |
VT vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VNQI's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF | 4.72% | 4.70% | 5.16% | 3.74% | 0.57% | 6.48% | 0.93% | 7.58% | 4.62% | 3.86% | 5.18% | 2.86% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and VNQI have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to VNQI (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VNQI's -38.35%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 2.74% for VNQI. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VNQI.
VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VNQI is REIT. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VNQI tracks S&P Global ex-U.S. Property Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.12% for VNQI.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and VNQI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer