VT vs. VHT
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VHT. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
VT vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 12.93%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.51%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
VT vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and VHT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VT and VHT has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VT vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
VHT
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
VHT
Financial Services
VT
VHT
Industrials
VT
VHT
Consumer Cyclical
VT
VHT
-
Communication Services
VT
VHT
-
Healthcare
VT
VHT
Consumer Defensive
VT
VHT
-
Energy
VT
VHT
-
Basic Materials
VT
VHT
-
Utilities
VT
VHT
-
Real Estate
VT
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
VT
VHT
VT vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.19 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 1.53 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 3.81 | +7.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -39.12% | -11.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -10.40% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -16.91% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -17.71% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -28.85% | -5.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -3.28% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -5.99% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 4.19% | -1.97% |
Volatility
VT vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.88% | +0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 10.46% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 14.70% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 15.01% | +1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.97% | +0.30% |
VT vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and VHT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VHT.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.09% for VHT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer