VT vs. VDE
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VDE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for VDE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDE.
Performance
VT vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 29.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 12.93%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
VDE
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 29.66%
- 6M
- 28.33%
- 1Y
- 35.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 20.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.39%
VT vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 29.66% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and VDE is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VT and VDE shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VT vs. VDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
VDE
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
VDE
-
Financial Services
VT
VDE
-
Industrials
VT
VDE
Consumer Cyclical
VT
VDE
-
Communication Services
VT
VDE
-
Healthcare
VT
VDE
-
Consumer Defensive
VT
VDE
-
Energy
VT
VDE
Basic Materials
VT
VDE
Utilities
VT
VDE
-
Real Estate
VT
VDE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
VT
VDE
VT vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.20 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 8.95 | +2.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VDE drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -74.20% | +23.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.80% | +2.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -21.41% | +4.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -26.58% | +0.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -69.29% | +35.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -8.26% | +6.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -19.95% | +12.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 4.21% | -1.99% |
Volatility
VT vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 7.15% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 16.59% | -5.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 20.46% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 26.45% | -10.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 29.93% | -12.66% |
VT vs. VDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VDE's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than VDE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.42% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and VDE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VDE's -74.20%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 9.39% for VDE. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDE.
VDE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VDE is Energy Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VDE tracks MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.09% for VDE.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer