VT vs. PRCOX
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and PRCOX (T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund) are both funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while PRCOX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price. VT is passively managed, while PRCOX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 15.99%/yr for PRCOX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for PRCOX.
Performance
VT vs. PRCOX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly higher than PRCOX's 8.95% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed PRCOX with an annualized return of 12.93%, while PRCOX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.99% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
PRCOX
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 21.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.80%
- 10Y*
- 15.99%
VT vs. PRCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
PRCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund | 8.95% | 16.34% | 26.41% | 29.82% | -18.80% | 28.06% | 19.82% | 33.04% | -4.73% | 23.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and PRCOX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008 | 0.94 |
The correlation between VT and PRCOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. PRCOX — Risk / Return Rank
VT
PRCOX
VT vs. PRCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | PRCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.59 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 11.74 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. PRCOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum PRCOX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and PRCOX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | PRCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -53.96% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -9.32% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -19.39% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -24.94% | -1.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -34.42% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -2.79% | +0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -9.17% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.04% | +0.18% |
Volatility
VT vs. PRCOX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) at 4.69%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | PRCOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 4.69% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 10.17% | +0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 12.51% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 17.42% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 18.39% | -1.12% |
VT vs. PRCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PRCOX's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. PRCOX - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than PRCOX's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRCOX T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund | 1.08% | 1.17% | 0.64% | 1.17% | 1.28% | 3.71% | 1.04% | 1.39% | 5.60% | 7.02% | 7.28% | 8.76% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VT and PRCOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to PRCOX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs PRCOX's -53.96%.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and PRCOX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer