PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. MALOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. MALOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.77% return, which is significantly higher than MALOX's 5.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed MALOX with an annualized return of 12.61%, while MALOX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.28% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.52%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
9.77%
6M
10.59%
1Y
25.47%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
12.61%

MALOX

1D
-2.27%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.99%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
13.89%
5Y*
5.47%
10Y*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. MALOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.77%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
MALOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
5.74%19.63%9.23%12.63%-15.86%6.69%24.93%17.56%-7.40%13.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and MALOX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008

0.95

The correlation between VT and MALOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. MALOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

MALOX
MALOX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MALOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MALOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MALOX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MALOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MALOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. MALOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTMALOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.12

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

9.13

+2.55

VT vs. MALOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is comparable to the MALOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and MALOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTMALOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

1.79

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.50

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.77

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.93

-0.50

Drawdowns

VT vs. MALOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than MALOX's maximum drawdown of -32.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and MALOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTMALOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-32.83%

-17.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.31%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-10.04%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-22.76%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-22.76%

-11.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-2.31%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-3.92%

-3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.93%

+0.26%

Volatility

VT vs. MALOX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.55% compared to BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (MALOX) at 3.53%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MALOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTMALOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

3.53%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.67%

8.22%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

9.87%

+3.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

10.91%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

10.73%

+6.53%

VT vs. MALOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MALOX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. MALOX - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than MALOX's 8.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MALOX
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund
8.72%9.22%7.68%1.54%6.01%10.32%10.15%5.68%5.50%4.81%2.10%9.86%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.63%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VT and MALOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VT has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to MALOX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs MALOX's -32.83%.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and MALOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer