VT vs. JSMD
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 13.03%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for JSMD. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
VT vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 13.03%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.87% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
VT vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.78% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and JSMD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between VT and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
JSMD
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Technology
VT
JSMD
Financial Services
VT
JSMD
Industrials
VT
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
VT
JSMD
Communication Services
VT
JSMD
Healthcare
VT
JSMD
Consumer Defensive
VT
JSMD
Energy
VT
JSMD
Basic Materials
VT
JSMD
Utilities
VT
JSMD
-
Real Estate
VT
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
VT
JSMD
VT vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.26 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.16 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 7.31 | +5.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -38.98% | -11.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -14.86% | +5.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -24.01% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -32.18% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -38.98% | +4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | 0.00% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -7.46% | +0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 4.38% | -2.16% |
Volatility
VT vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.46%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 8.24%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 8.24% | -2.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 17.21% | -6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 21.80% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 22.99% | -6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 22.83% | -5.55% |
VT vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than JSMD's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and JSMD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to VT (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 13.87% vs 13.03% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 13.87% return vs 13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.46% for JSMD.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.30% for JSMD.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer