PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -5.72% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed GLD with an annualized return of 12.94%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.54% annualized return.


VT

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
9.79%
6M
8.68%
1Y
22.91%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
10.36%
10Y*
12.94%

GLD

1D
1.13%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
-5.72%
6M
-10.34%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
28.11%
5Y*
17.53%
10Y*
11.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.79%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-5.72%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and GLD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.14

Over the past year, VT and GLD have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.14, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.17

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.84

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.22

2.30

+7.92

VT vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-45.56%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-26.21%

+16.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-26.21%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-26.21%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-26.21%

-8.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

-24.66%

+21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-16.17%

+9.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

9.50%

-7.25%

Volatility

VT vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.55%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

8.81%

-3.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.29%

24.47%

-13.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.52%

27.73%

-14.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

18.30%

-2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

16.07%

+1.11%

VT vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and GLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (8.81%) compared to VT (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.94% vs 11.54% for GLD. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 11.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while GLD is Gold. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.40% for GLD.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer