VT vs. EBND
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and EBND (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while EBND is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 13.03%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for EBND. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for EBND.
Performance
VT vs. EBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than EBND's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed EBND with an annualized return of 13.03%, while EBND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.79% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
EBND
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 1.16%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- 1Y
- 6.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.64%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
VT vs. EBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.78% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 1.16% | 15.83% | -2.70% | 9.02% | -11.84% | -9.66% | 4.49% | 10.40% | -6.52% | 13.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and EBND is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between VT and EBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. EBND — Risk / Return Rank
VT
EBND
VT vs. EBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.19 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 1.04 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 3.32 | +9.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. EBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than EBND's maximum drawdown of -29.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and EBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -29.51% | -20.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -6.63% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -9.25% | -7.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -26.15% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -29.50% | -4.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -1.90% | +1.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -10.85% | +3.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.07% | +0.15% |
Volatility
VT vs. EBND - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF (EBND) at 2.70%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | EBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 2.70% | +2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 6.22% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 7.13% | +6.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 9.01% | +7.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 9.19% | +8.09% |
VT vs. EBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than EBND's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. EBND - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EBND's 5.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBND SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF | 5.75% | 5.54% | 5.89% | 5.26% | 4.75% | 3.83% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 4.70% | 2.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and EBND have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to EBND (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs EBND's -29.51%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 13.03% vs 1.79% for EBND. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, EBND has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 1.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for EBND.
EBND has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 1.58% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while EBND is Emerging Markets Bonds. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while EBND tracks Bloomberg Emerging Market Local Currency Government Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.30% for EBND.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and EBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer