PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSTL vs. ASMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSTL vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTL achieves a -35.33% return, which is significantly lower than ASMG's 86.81% return.


VSTL

1D
-0.06%
1M
-6.33%
6M
-28.91%
YTD
-35.33%
1Y
-66.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-58.65%

ASMG

1D
-2.63%
1M
-17.29%
6M
9.24%
YTD
86.81%
1Y
307.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
105.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.03M$5.30M$5.99M
$651.64K$708.80K$1.90M

VSTL vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VSTL and ASMG is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSTL vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSTL
VSTL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
VSTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTL Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTL Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ASMG
ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSTL vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTLASMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.38

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

7.35

-8.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.36

22.78

-24.14

VSTL vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTL Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the ASMG Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTL and ASMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSTL vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTL drawdown since its inception was -71.42%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTL and ASMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTLASMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.42%

-43.95%

-27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.42%

-41.10%

-30.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.28%

-35.29%

-32.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.67%

-13.54%

-30.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.96%

13.24%

+35.72%

Volatility

VSTL vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long VST ETF (VSTL) is 25.95%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 29.36%. This indicates that VSTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTLASMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.95%

29.36%

-3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.40%

74.68%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.01%

92.16%

+4.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

97.03%

89.81%

+7.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

97.03%

89.81%

+7.22%

VSTL vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSTL has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ASMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSTL vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

VSTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.00%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VSTL and ASMG have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASMG has higher volatility (29.36%) compared to VSTL (25.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTL dropped -71.42% vs ASMG's -43.95%.

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 307.23% vs -66.54% for VSTL. On fees, ASMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VSTL has been the lower-risk option at 25.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 307.23% return vs -66.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for VSTL.

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 6.00%, compared with 0.00% for VSTL.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for VSTL and 0.75% for ASMG.

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSTL and ASMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer