VSTBX vs. SCCPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX).
VSTBX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009. SCCPX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Jun 30, 2011.
Performance
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSTBX Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | -0.08% | 6.75% | 5.37% | 6.17% | -5.73% | -0.41% | 5.07% | 9.68% | 0.92% | 2.48% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | -2.12% | 6.37% | -1.68% | 9.20% | -23.65% | -0.01% | 625.95% | 10.78% | -0.95% | 4.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSTBX achieves a -0.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCCPX's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, VSTBX has underperformed SCCPX with an annualized return of 3.01%, while SCCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.91% annualized return.
VSTBX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 4.66%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
SCCPX
- 1D
- 0.91%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- -2.12%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.77%
- 10Y*
- 21.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSTBX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SCCPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VSTBX vs. SCCPX — Risk / Return Rank
VSTBX
SCCPX
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) and Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSTBX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.41 | 0.34 | +2.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 0.51 | +3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.06 | +0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.75 | 0.68 | +3.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.83 | 1.62 | +13.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSTBX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 0.34 | +2.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | -0.25 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.27 | 0.12 | +1.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.46 | 0.11 | +1.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between VSTBX and SCCPX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Dividend Comparison
VSTBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, less than SCCPX's 4.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSTBX Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares | 4.04% | 4.34% | 4.29% | 3.09% | 2.00% | 1.80% | 2.27% | 5.40% | 2.67% | 2.27% | 1.96% | 2.25% |
SCCPX Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund | 4.71% | 4.99% | 4.84% | 3.54% | 4.11% | 13.93% | 88.30% | 3.01% | 3.31% | 3.76% | 3.41% | 3.16% |
Drawdowns
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSTBX drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, smaller than the maximum SCCPX drawdown of -31.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTBX and SCCPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSTBX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -31.88% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.31% | -5.49% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.34% | -31.88% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.34% | -31.88% | +22.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.05% | -15.66% | +14.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -6.30% | +5.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.33% | 2.31% | -1.98% |
Volatility
VSTBX vs. SCCPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond Index Fund Institutional Shares (VSTBX) is 0.76%, while Sterling Capital Long Duration Corporate Bond Fund (SCCPX) has a volatility of 3.26%. This indicates that VSTBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VSTBX | SCCPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.76% | 3.26% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.16% | 5.20% | -4.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98% | 8.85% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.70% | 11.11% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.37% | 182.21% | -179.84% |