PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VST vs. PDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VST vs. PDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vistra Corp. (VST) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly higher than PDD's -28.07% return.


VST

1D
1.12%
1M
4.31%
YTD
-8.13%
6M
-12.74%
1Y
-14.37%
3Y*
83.39%
5Y*
54.40%
10Y*

PDD

1D
0.32%
1M
-14.67%
YTD
-28.07%
6M
-27.15%
1Y
-18.91%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-7.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VST vs. PDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VST
Vistra Corp.
-8.13%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%2.60%
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
-28.07%16.91%-33.71%79.41%39.88%-67.19%369.78%68.54%-15.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VST and PDD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.13

Fundamentals

EPS

VST:

$8.60

PDD:

CN¥64.39

PE Ratio

VST:

17.20

PDD:

8.58

PEG Ratio

VST:

0.39

PDD:

0.08

PS Ratio

VST:

2.19

PDD:

1.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

VST:

$17.20B

PDD:

CN¥441.76B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VST:

$1.12B

PDD:

CN¥247.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

VST:

$4.34B

PDD:

CN¥134.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VST vs. PDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

PDD
PDD Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDD Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
PDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDD Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VST vs. PDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTPDDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

0.91

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

-0.52

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

-1.08

+0.39

VST vs. PDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VST Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is higher than the PDD Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VST and PDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VST vs. PDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum PDD drawdown of -87.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and PDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTPDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.32%

-87.41%

+34.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.01%

-41.14%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.80%

-48.40%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

-80.88%

+32.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.89%

-59.79%

+27.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-39.32%

+25.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.73%

19.55%

+1.18%

Volatility

VST vs. PDD - Volatility Comparison

Vistra Corp. (VST) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Pinduoduo Inc. (PDD) at 14.35%. This indicates that VST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTPDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

14.35%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.96%

25.50%

+12.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.75%

32.48%

+16.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.97%

68.09%

-20.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.22%

69.37%

-27.15%

Dividends

VST vs. PDD - Dividend Comparison

VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while PDD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PDD
Pinduoduo Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.61%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%

Financials

VST vs. PDD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Pinduoduo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B120.00B20222023202420252026
5.64B
105.59B
(VST) Total Revenue
(PDD) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VST values in USD, PDD values in CNY

VST vs. PDD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vistra Corp. and Pinduoduo Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%202220232024202520260
55.9%
Portfolio components
VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

PDD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.98B and revenue of 105.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.9%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

PDD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported an operating income of 21.02B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

PDD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pinduoduo Inc. reported a net income of 12.47B and revenue of 105.59B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VST and PDD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VST has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to PDD (14.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VST dropped -53.32% vs PDD's -87.41%.

VST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.30 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VST and PDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer