PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSOL vs. EZPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Solana ETF (VSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSOL achieves a -40.84% return, which is significantly lower than EZPZ's -28.21% return.


VSOL

1D
-4.61%
1M
-14.43%
YTD
-40.84%
6M
-47.89%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

EZPZ

1D
-3.03%
1M
-18.55%
YTD
-28.21%
6M
-33.71%
1Y
-39.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VSOL
VanEck Solana ETF
-40.84%-4.01%
EZPZ
Franklin Crypto Index ETF
-28.21%-5.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VSOL and EZPZ is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025

0.90

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSOL vs. EZPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSOL

EZPZ
EZPZ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
EZPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EZPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
EZPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
EZPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
EZPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Solana ETF (VSOL) and Franklin Crypto Index ETF (EZPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSOLEZPZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.90

-0.61

-0.29

Drawdowns

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSOL drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, roughly equal to the maximum EZPZ drawdown of -52.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSOL and EZPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSOLEZPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-52.38%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.27%

-51.59%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.83%

-21.72%

-7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.44%

Volatility

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSOLEZPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.67%

46.83%

+25.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.67%

47.65%

+25.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.67%

47.65%

+25.02%

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSOL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EZPZ's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSOL vs. EZPZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither VSOL nor EZPZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VSOL and EZPZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, EZPZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EZPZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VSOL.

VSOL and EZPZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VSOL and 0.19% for EZPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSOL and EZPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer