VSLU vs. BUFX
VSLU (Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSLU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Applied Finance, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSLU charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
VSLU vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSLU achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.14% return.
VSLU
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 6.76%
- 6M
- 7.74%
- 1Y
- 27.23%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.17%
- YTD
- 4.14%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSLU vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 6.76% | 16.01% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 4.14% | 5.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSLU and BUFX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSLU vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
VSLU
BUFX
VSLU vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF (VSLU) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSLU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.19 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.98 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.33 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSLU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 2.70 | -1.83 |
Drawdowns
VSLU vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSLU drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSLU and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSLU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -2.87% | -20.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.37% | -0.02% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.89% | -0.24% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | — | — |
Volatility
VSLU vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSLU | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.48% | 3.99% | +8.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.19% | 3.99% | +12.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 3.99% | +12.15% |
VSLU vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSLU has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSLU vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
VSLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSLU Applied Finance Valuation Large Cap US ETF | 0.43% | 0.46% | 0.60% | 0.60% | 0.99% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSLU and BUFX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VSLU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VSLU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
VSLU has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
VSLU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Applied Finance and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for VSLU and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for VSLU and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer