PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSGX vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSGX vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSGX achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 38.57% return.


VSGX

1D
-3.39%
1M
1.62%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.12%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
19.42%
5Y*
7.76%
10Y*

KEMX

1D
-5.69%
1M
5.55%
YTD
38.57%
6M
40.16%
1Y
71.39%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSGX vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
14.48%30.77%5.72%15.62%-18.61%7.24%13.01%9.69%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
38.57%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VSGX and KEMX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.86

The correlation between VSGX and KEMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSGX vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSGX
KEMX

Technology

30.0%
46.8%

Financial Services

28.3%
18.7%

Healthcare

8.8%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
5.5%

Industrials

7.2%
7.6%

Basic Materials

5.1%
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.6%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.0%

Utilities

0.5%
1.7%

Energy

0.0%
4.0%

Technology

VSGX
30.0%
KEMX
46.8%

Financial Services

VSGX
28.3%
KEMX
18.7%

Healthcare

VSGX
8.8%
KEMX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VSGX
8.3%
KEMX
5.5%

Industrials

VSGX
7.2%
KEMX
7.6%

Basic Materials

VSGX
5.1%
KEMX
7.6%

Consumer Defensive

VSGX
4.8%
KEMX
2.6%

Communication Services

VSGX
4.1%
KEMX
2.9%

Real Estate

VSGX
2.0%
KEMX
1.0%

Utilities

VSGX
0.5%
KEMX
1.7%

Energy

VSGX
0.0%
KEMX
4.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSGX vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSGX
VSGX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
VSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSGX vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSGXKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.67

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

17.76

-8.34

VSGX vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSGX and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSGX vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSGX drawdown since its inception was -33.09%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGX and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSGXKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.09%

-38.80%

+5.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.84%

-15.36%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.83%

-19.62%

+5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.14%

-30.85%

-1.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.39%

-5.69%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-8.82%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

4.03%

-0.69%

Volatility

VSGX vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF (VSGX) is 7.90%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that VSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSGXKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.90%

13.52%

-5.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

23.20%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

25.26%

-7.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.96%

-2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

21.33%

-3.16%

VSGX vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSGX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSGX vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

VSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than KEMX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.37%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%
VSGX
Vanguard ESG International Stock ETF
2.97%3.23%3.10%2.77%2.61%2.49%1.67%2.28%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSGX and KEMX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMX has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to VSGX (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGX dropped -33.09% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.33% vs 7.76% for VSGX. On fees, VSGX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VSGX has been the lower-risk option at 7.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSGX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for KEMX.

VSGX has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 2.37% for KEMX.

VSGX tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Choice Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VSGX and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSGX and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer