VSGBX vs. SCYB
VSGBX (Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both funds - VSGBX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Vanguard, while SCYB is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Over the past year, VSGBX returned 3.70% vs 7.03% for SCYB. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSGBX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSGBX achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than SCYB's 1.76% return.
VSGBX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 1.57%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VSGBX Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares | 0.50% | 5.83% | 4.17% | 3.33% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.76% | 8.33% | 8.15% | 6.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSGBX and SCYB is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSGBX vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
VSGBX
SCYB
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSGBX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 2.89 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.31 | 12.95 | -2.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSGBX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.89 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.64 | 1.70 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSGBX drawdown since its inception was -7.42%, which is greater than SCYB's maximum drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGBX and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSGBX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.42% | -4.92% | -2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.35% | -2.44% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -0.12% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -0.52% | -0.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.38% | 0.54% | -0.16% |
Volatility
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) is 0.71%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that VSGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSGBX | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 1.09% | -0.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.54% | 2.94% | -1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 3.75% | -1.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.67% | 5.13% | -2.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.16% | 5.13% | -2.97% |
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSGBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VSGBX vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
VSGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than SCYB's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSGBX Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares | 3.85% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 3.32% | 1.67% | 1.37% | 1.68% | 2.32% | 1.92% | 1.35% | 1.33% | 1.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSGBX and SCYB have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYB has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to VSGBX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGBX dropped -7.42% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
SCYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSGBX and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer