PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSGBX vs. FTHRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSGBX achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than FTHRX's 0.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VSGBX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.04% annualized return.


VSGBX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.60%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
1.59%
10Y*
1.81%

FTHRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
YTD
0.15%
6M
0.31%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.54%
5Y*
1.06%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSGBX
Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares
0.60%5.83%4.17%3.82%-5.31%-0.66%4.36%4.10%1.27%0.69%
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
0.15%6.89%3.25%5.55%-9.17%-1.60%7.06%7.20%0.52%2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VSGBX and FTHRX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.82

The correlation between VSGBX and FTHRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSGBX vs. FTHRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSGBX
VSGBX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VSGBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSGBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSGBX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
VSGBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSGBX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

FTHRX
FTHRX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
FTHRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTHRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTHRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FTHRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTHRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSGBXFTHRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.41

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.09

2.20

+0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.07

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.21

6.21

+5.00

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSGBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the FTHRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSGBX and FTHRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSGBXFTHRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.41

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.26

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.60

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.64

0.91

+0.73

Drawdowns

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSGBX drawdown since its inception was -7.42%, smaller than the maximum FTHRX drawdown of -19.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSGBX and FTHRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSGBXFTHRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.42%

-19.01%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.35%

-2.11%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

-2.68%

+1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.42%

-13.18%

+5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.42%

-13.25%

+5.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-1.09%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.73%

-3.07%

+2.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.38%

0.70%

-0.32%

Volatility

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares (VSGBX) is 0.71%, while Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) has a volatility of 0.91%. This indicates that VSGBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSGBXFTHRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.71%

0.91%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

2.03%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

2.81%

-0.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.67%

4.03%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.16%

3.40%

-1.24%

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSGBX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSGBX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison

VSGBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than FTHRX's 3.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTHRX
Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund
3.69%3.59%3.49%2.94%1.55%1.53%4.16%2.49%2.48%2.20%2.63%2.13%
VSGBX
Vanguard Short-Term Federal Fund Investor Shares
3.85%3.69%3.47%3.32%1.67%1.37%1.68%2.32%1.92%1.35%1.33%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VSGBX and FTHRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTHRX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to VSGBX (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSGBX dropped -7.42% vs FTHRX's -19.01%.

VSGBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSGBX and FTHRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer