PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSEAX vs. NINLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Small Cap Equity Fund (VSEAX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSEAX achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than NINLX's 22.52% return. Over the past 10 years, VSEAX has underperformed NINLX with an annualized return of 8.55%, while NINLX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.51% annualized return.


VSEAX

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.48%
YTD
8.19%
6M
9.70%
1Y
11.66%
3Y*
8.93%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*
8.55%

NINLX

1D
-0.30%
1M
5.12%
YTD
22.52%
6M
25.24%
1Y
58.40%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSEAX
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity Fund
8.19%-2.63%11.46%11.71%-16.27%15.47%18.14%28.15%-9.20%15.29%
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
22.52%18.20%7.62%13.89%-20.22%26.42%27.14%24.92%-10.56%16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VSEAX and NINLX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2000

0.91

The correlation between VSEAX and NINLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSEAX vs. NINLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSEAX
VSEAX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VSEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VSEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NINLX
NINLX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
NINLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NINLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NINLX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NINLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
NINLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Small Cap Equity Fund (VSEAX) and Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSEAXNINLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.68

2.92

-2.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

3.76

-2.65

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.47

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

6.23

-5.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.51

22.57

-20.06

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSEAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the NINLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSEAX and NINLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSEAXNINLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

2.92

-2.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.35

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.54

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Drawdowns

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSEAX drawdown since its inception was -48.86%, smaller than the maximum NINLX drawdown of -59.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSEAX and NINLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSEAXNINLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.86%

-59.95%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.89%

-9.39%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.44%

-26.46%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.53%

-28.71%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-44.43%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.01%

-0.76%

-1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.08%

-9.91%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

2.59%

+1.79%

Volatility

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Small Cap Equity Fund (VSEAX) is 3.86%, while Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund (NINLX) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that VSEAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NINLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSEAXNINLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

5.37%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.02%

14.48%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.91%

20.32%

-3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

21.77%

-2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.66%

23.09%

-2.43%

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSEAX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NINLX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSEAX vs. NINLX - Dividend Comparison

VSEAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.52%, more than NINLX's 3.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NINLX
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value Fund
3.47%4.25%0.92%0.25%3.76%6.40%1.62%2.85%14.51%5.19%1.42%5.22%
VSEAX
JPMorgan Small Cap Equity Fund
23.52%25.45%14.31%4.81%15.49%22.80%2.89%4.96%8.25%5.99%2.98%8.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSEAX and NINLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NINLX has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to VSEAX (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSEAX dropped -48.86% vs NINLX's -59.95%.

NINLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSEAX and NINLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer