VSDM vs. ZMUN
VSDM (Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. VSDM is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSDM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSDM achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.57% return.
VSDM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.22% | 0.73% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSDM and ZMUN is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSDM vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
VSDM
ZMUN
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VSDM) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSDM | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSDM | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.19 | 6.46 | -4.27 |
Drawdowns
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSDM drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDM and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSDM | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.81% | -0.09% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.02% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -0.01% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSDM | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.07% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 0.54% | +0.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 0.54% | +1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.95% | 0.54% | +1.41% |
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSDM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSDM vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
VSDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.11% | 3.06% | 0.35% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSDM and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VSDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VSDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
VSDM has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VSDM and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for VSDM and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer