PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VSDA vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VSDA vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
3.70%6.67%9.40%8.74%5.02%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
-2.26%25.50%20.10%28.81%-2.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -2.26% return.


VSDA

1D
0.98%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
3.70%
6M
3.36%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*

CGDV

1D
2.88%
1M
-6.44%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
1.93%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VSDA vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDACGDVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

1.26

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.83

-0.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

2.01

-1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

8.64

-5.76

VSDA vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and CGDV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDACGDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.26

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.04

-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and CGDV is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VSDA vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than CGDV's 1.34% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.64%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.34%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and CGDV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDACGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-21.82%

-10.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-10.91%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-7.15%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-3.72%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

2.54%

+0.82%

Volatility

VSDA vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 3.53%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.60%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VSDACGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

5.60%

-2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

9.27%

-1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

16.77%

-2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

15.62%

-1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

15.62%

+1.05%