PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCGX vs. VRTVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VRTVX's 18.94% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCGX has underperformed VRTVX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while VRTVX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.48% annualized return.


VSCGX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.69%
YTD
5.65%
6M
5.96%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
6.62%

VRTVX

1D
0.95%
1M
4.04%
YTD
18.94%
6M
18.07%
1Y
43.21%
3Y*
18.32%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
10.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.65%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
18.94%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCGX and VRTVX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.75

The correlation between VSCGX and VRTVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCGX vs. VRTVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCGXVRTVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.43

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

5.34

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

18.14

-5.69

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VRTVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCGX and VRTVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCGXVRTVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.54

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.32

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.44

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.48

+0.38

Drawdowns

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, smaller than the maximum VRTVX drawdown of -45.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and VRTVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCGXVRTVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-45.98%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-8.54%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.71%

-26.85%

+20.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-26.85%

+6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.15%

-45.98%

+25.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.25%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-7.78%

+4.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

2.51%

-1.33%

Volatility

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) is 2.17%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that VSCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCGXVRTVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

4.90%

-2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

11.98%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

17.95%

-11.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.70%

21.67%

-13.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.37%

23.71%

-16.34%

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTVX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSCGX vs. VRTVX - Dividend Comparison

VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than VRTVX's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.58%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.24%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSCGX and VRTVX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTVX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to VSCGX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCGX dropped -30.62% vs VRTVX's -45.98%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCGX and VRTVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer