PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCGX vs. VBIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than VBIAX's 7.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCGX has underperformed VBIAX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while VBIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.83% annualized return.


VSCGX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.69%
YTD
5.65%
6M
5.96%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
6.62%

VBIAX

1D
0.15%
1M
3.71%
YTD
7.35%
6M
7.26%
1Y
19.35%
3Y*
15.04%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
9.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.65%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%
VBIAX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares
7.35%13.61%14.58%17.54%-16.90%14.21%16.40%21.78%-2.86%13.89%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCGX and VBIAX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2000

0.91

The correlation between VSCGX and VBIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSCGX
VBIAX

Technology

27.4%
33.5%

Financial Services

16.1%
12.0%

Industrials

12.3%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
10.0%

Healthcare

8.3%
9.2%

Communication Services

8.0%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.7%

Energy

4.3%
3.7%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.0%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.5%
2.4%

Technology

VSCGX
27.4%
VBIAX
33.5%

Financial Services

VSCGX
16.1%
VBIAX
12.0%

Industrials

VSCGX
12.3%
VBIAX
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSCGX
9.4%
VBIAX
10.0%

Healthcare

VSCGX
8.3%
VBIAX
9.2%

Communication Services

VSCGX
8.0%
VBIAX
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

VSCGX
4.8%
VBIAX
4.7%

Energy

VSCGX
4.3%
VBIAX
3.7%

Basic Materials

VSCGX
4.3%
VBIAX
2.0%

Utilities

VSCGX
2.7%
VBIAX
2.3%

Real Estate

VSCGX
2.5%
VBIAX
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCGX vs. VBIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

VBIAX
VBIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VBIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VBIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSCGXVBIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.47

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

3.42

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.45

15.60

-3.15

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the VBIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCGX and VBIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSCGXVBIAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.52

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.73

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.88

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.64

+0.22

Drawdowns

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, smaller than the maximum VBIAX drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and VBIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCGXVBIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-35.90%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-5.83%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.71%

-11.70%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-21.53%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.15%

-22.78%

+2.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-4.44%

+1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

1.27%

-0.09%

Volatility

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund (VSCGX) and Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares (VBIAX) have volatilities of 2.17% and 2.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCGXVBIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.17%

2.26%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.09%

6.11%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.16%

7.90%

-1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.70%

11.05%

-3.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.37%

11.21%

-3.84%

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VBIAX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSCGX vs. VBIAX - Dividend Comparison

VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, which matches VBIAX's 5.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VBIAX
Vanguard Balanced Index Fund Admiral Shares
5.21%6.00%5.27%4.35%2.83%3.19%2.65%2.28%2.32%1.95%2.09%2.09%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy Conservative Growth Fund
5.24%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, VSCGX and VBIAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VBIAX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to VSCGX (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCGX dropped -30.62% vs VBIAX's -35.90%.

VBIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCGX and VBIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer