PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSCGX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSCGX achieves a 4.37% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.84% return. Over the past 10 years, VSCGX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 6.28%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.69% annualized return.


VSCGX

1D
0.04%
1M
-0.62%
6M
2.73%
YTD
4.37%
1Y
10.41%
3Y*
11.16%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
6.28%
ALL TIME*
6.72%

SIFAX

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.86%
6M
6.16%
YTD
8.84%
1Y
12.23%
3Y*
7.17%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*
3.69%
ALL TIME*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund
4.37%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.84%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VSCGX and SIFAX is -0.24, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.29

The correlation between VSCGX and SIFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSCGX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSCGXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.40

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.00

2.82

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

9.60

-1.35

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSCGX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSCGX drawdown since its inception was -30.62%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSCGX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSCGXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.62%

-23.62%

-7.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.19%

-4.47%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-4.47%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.15%

-8.32%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.15%

-13.64%

-6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-1.15%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.99%

-8.48%

+5.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.31%

-0.06%

Volatility

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) at 1.69%. This indicates that VSCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSCGXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

1.69%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.77%

4.93%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.74%

5.77%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.81%

5.65%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.40%

5.24%

+2.16%

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSCGX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSCGX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

VSCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than SIFAX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.18%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund
5.33%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSCGX and SIFAX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to SIFAX (1.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSCGX dropped -30.62% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSCGX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer