PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTVX vs. VDIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTVX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTVX has underperformed VDIGX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while VDIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.27% annualized return.


VRTVX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.22%
YTD
17.82%
6M
19.19%
1Y
44.03%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
10.37%

VDIGX

1D
-0.41%
1M
2.26%
YTD
2.30%
6M
2.90%
1Y
8.29%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
12.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.82%12.21%8.07%14.71%-14.52%28.06%4.81%22.40%-12.83%7.91%
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
2.30%11.11%20.84%8.11%-4.89%24.86%12.04%30.94%0.08%19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTVX and VDIGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.74

The correlation between VRTVX and VDIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTVX vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTVX
VRTVX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VRTVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VDIGX
VDIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VDIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTVXVDIGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

0.85

+1.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

1.30

+2.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.15

+0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.05

0.97

+4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.17

3.73

+13.44

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the VDIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTVX and VDIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTVXVDIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

0.85

+1.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.71

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.78

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.62

-0.14

Drawdowns

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTVX drawdown since its inception was -45.98%, roughly equal to the maximum VDIGX drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTVX and VDIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTVXVDIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.98%

-45.23%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.54%

-9.09%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.85%

-10.23%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.85%

-16.18%

-10.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-32.98%

-13.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.41%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-6.65%

-1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

2.36%

+0.15%

Volatility

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTVX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 2.35%. This indicates that VRTVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTVXVDIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

2.35%

+2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

7.61%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.96%

10.08%

+7.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

13.86%

+7.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.71%

15.70%

+8.01%

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTVX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VDIGX's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTVX vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison

VRTVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than VDIGX's 24.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
24.00%21.90%21.94%2.29%6.06%5.45%2.83%4.70%8.72%5.16%2.86%5.70%
VRTVX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.60%1.49%1.84%2.08%2.15%1.56%1.54%1.87%2.17%1.74%1.52%2.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTVX and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTVX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to VDIGX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTVX dropped -45.98% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.

VRTVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTVX and VDIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer