VRTPX vs. PRRSX
VRTPX (Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund) and PRRSX (PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund) are both REIT funds. Over the past 5 years, VRTPX returned 2.05%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for PRRSX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VRTPX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PRRSX.
Performance
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRTPX achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than PRRSX's 12.29% return.
VRTPX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 2.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PRRSX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 10.24%
- 1Y
- 16.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.76%
- 10Y*
- 6.58%
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 8.00% | 2.22% | 3.72% | 13.17% | -26.14% | 40.37% | -4.65% | 28.96% | -5.99% | 1.37% |
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 12.29% | 5.21% | 5.11% | 12.30% | -29.37% | 53.74% | -3.80% | 29.61% | -6.42% | 1.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTPX and PRRSX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2017 | 0.96 |
The correlation between VRTPX and PRRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRTPX vs. PRRSX — Risk / Return Rank
VRTPX
PRRSX
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) and PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRTPX | PRRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.73 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.78 | 5.95 | -2.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRTPX | PRRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | 1.10 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.19 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.35 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTPX drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum PRRSX drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTPX and PRRSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTPX | PRRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -77.82% | +35.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.34% | -9.05% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.19% | -17.77% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.35% | -37.14% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.29% | -3.11% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.40% | -13.09% | +1.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 2.62% | +0.02% |
Volatility
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund (VRTPX) is 3.79%, while PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund (PRRSX) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that VRTPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRTPX | PRRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 4.33% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 10.18% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 14.26% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 20.20% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 21.87% | -0.08% |
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTPX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PRRSX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRTPX vs. PRRSX - Dividend Comparison
VRTPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than PRRSX's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PRRSX PIMCO Variable Insurance Trust Real Estate Real Return Strategy Fund | 0.79% | 2.19% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 18.62% | 34.01% | 7.21% | 7.99% | 0.81% | 1.67% | 0.66% | 8.38% |
VRTPX Vanguard Real Estate II Index Fund | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.80% | 3.93% | 4.52% | 2.58% | 3.92% | 3.50% | 4.77% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VRTPX and PRRSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PRRSX has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VRTPX (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTPX dropped -42.33% vs PRRSX's -77.82%.
PRRSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRTPX and PRRSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer