PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTGX vs. VDIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTGX achieves a 16.85% return, which is significantly higher than VDIGX's 2.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTGX has underperformed VDIGX with an annualized return of 11.40%, while VDIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.


VRTGX

1D
-1.36%
1M
2.41%
YTD
16.85%
6M
13.68%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
11.40%

VDIGX

1D
-0.45%
1M
2.46%
YTD
2.17%
6M
2.63%
1Y
7.56%
3Y*
13.90%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
12.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.85%12.97%15.26%18.80%-26.30%2.82%34.81%28.84%-9.21%22.27%
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
2.17%11.11%20.84%8.11%-4.89%24.86%12.04%30.94%0.08%19.32%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTGX and VDIGX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.72

The correlation between VRTGX and VDIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTGX vs. VDIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTGX
VRTGX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
VRTGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VDIGX
VDIGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VDIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
VDIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) and Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTGXVDIGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.14

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

0.86

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.17

3.32

+5.85

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the VDIGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTGX and VDIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTGXVDIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.78

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.70

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.78

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.62

-0.10

Drawdowns

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTGX drawdown since its inception was -41.97%, smaller than the maximum VDIGX drawdown of -45.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTGX and VDIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTGXVDIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.97%

-45.23%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.80%

-9.09%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.54%

-10.23%

-18.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.48%

-16.18%

-24.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.97%

-32.98%

-8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.54%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.43%

-6.65%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

2.36%

+1.74%

Volatility

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a higher volatility of 6.62% compared to Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund (VDIGX) at 2.20%. This indicates that VRTGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTGXVDIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

2.20%

+4.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.82%

7.57%

+8.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

10.07%

+11.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.56%

13.86%

+10.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.51%

15.70%

+8.81%

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VDIGX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTGX vs. VDIGX - Dividend Comparison

VRTGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VDIGX's 24.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDIGX
Vanguard Dividend Growth Fund
24.04%21.90%21.94%2.29%6.06%5.45%2.83%4.70%8.72%5.16%2.86%5.70%
VRTGX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.61%0.57%0.62%0.85%0.78%0.54%0.53%0.90%0.85%0.75%1.07%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTGX and VDIGX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTGX has higher volatility (6.62%) compared to VDIGX (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTGX dropped -41.97% vs VDIGX's -45.23%.

VRTGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTGX and VDIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer