PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. SNDK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRT vs. SNDK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 86.99% return, which is significantly lower than SNDK's 734.15% return.


VRT

1D
1.68%
1M
-18.14%
YTD
86.99%
6M
87.85%
1Y
164.84%
3Y*
138.33%
5Y*
63.29%
10Y*

SNDK

1D
5.24%
1M
36.82%
YTD
734.15%
6M
860.37%
1Y
4,694.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. SNDK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
86.99%69.02%
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
734.15%356.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and SNDK is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2025

0.40

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRT:

$118.76B

SNDK:

$310.88B

EPS

VRT:

$3.99

SNDK:

$29.70

PE Ratio

VRT:

75.98

SNDK:

66.67

PS Ratio

VRT:

10.92

SNDK:

22.79

PB Ratio

VRT:

27.98

SNDK:

22.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRT:

$10.84B

SNDK:

$13.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRT:

$3.92B

SNDK:

$7.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRT:

$2.35B

SNDK:

$5.37B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRT vs. SNDK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SNDK
SNDK Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SNDK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNDK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNDK Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
SNDK Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNDK Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. SNDK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Sandisk Corporation (SNDK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTSNDKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-45.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.16

-0.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

152.17

-145.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.79

461.00

-443.20

VRT vs. SNDK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is lower than the SNDK Sharpe Ratio of 47.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and SNDK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. SNDK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than SNDK's maximum drawdown of -47.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and SNDK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTSNDKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-47.50%

-23.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.32%

-31.34%

+6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.50%

0.00%

-19.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-13.74%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

10.32%

-1.02%

Volatility

VRT vs. SNDK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) is 16.12%, while Sandisk Corporation (SNDK) has a volatility of 26.68%. This indicates that VRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SNDK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTSNDKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.12%

26.68%

-10.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.82%

71.96%

-26.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.29%

99.48%

-41.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.88%

97.64%

-35.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.61%

97.64%

-43.03%

Dividends

VRT vs. SNDK - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while SNDK has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SNDK
Sandisk Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

VRT vs. SNDK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Sandisk Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
2.65B
5.95B
(VRT) Total Revenue
(SNDK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VRT vs. SNDK - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Sandisk Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
37.7%
78.4%
Portfolio components
VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

SNDK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a gross profit of 4.66B and revenue of 5.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.4%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

SNDK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported an operating income of 4.11B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 69.1%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

SNDK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sandisk Corporation reported a net income of 3.62B and revenue of 5.95B, resulting in a net margin of 60.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRT and SNDK have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SNDK has higher volatility (26.68%) compared to VRT (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs SNDK's -47.50%.

SNDK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (47.94 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and SNDK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer