PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VRT vs. SCR.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

VRT vs. SCR.PA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and SCR.PA (SCOR SE) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while SCR.PA operates in Insurance - Reinsurance (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 63.29%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for SCR.PA. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and SCOR SE (SCR.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VRT is traded in USD, while SCR.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the SCR.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 86.99% return, which is significantly higher than SCR.PA's 13.13% return.

VRT

1D
1.68%
1M
-19.50%
YTD
86.99%
6M
87.85%
1Y
173.26%
3Y*
138.33%
5Y*
63.29%
10Y*
—

SCR.PA

1D
0.22%
1M
-2.39%
YTD
13.13%
6M
19.95%
1Y
17.08%
3Y*
17.81%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
7.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.		86.99%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
SCR.PA
SCOR SE		13.13%47.53%-10.68%34.54%-21.25%3.53%-23.15%-2.46%17.36%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and SCR.PA is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vertiv Holdings Co.

SCOR SE

Often compared with VRT:
VRT vs. GEVVRT vs. CLSVRT vs. ALABVRT vs. SPYVRT vs. VOOVRT vs. POWLVRT vs. APP
Often compared with SCR.PA:
SCR.PA vs. LOOMIS.STSCR.PA vs. ORNBV.HESCR.PA vs. BBY.LSCR.PA vs. 2318.HKSCR.PA vs. APPSCR.PA vs. SFMSCR.PA vs. NFLX

Return for Risk

VRT vs. SCR.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
SCR.PA
SCR.PA Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCR.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and SCOR SE (SCR.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VRTSCR.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.85
0.63

+2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.34
0.94

+2.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.14

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.55

0.81

+5.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.79

2.06

+15.74

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the SCR.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and SCR.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than SCR.PA's maximum drawdown of -67.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and SCR.PA.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VRTSCR.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-67.14%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.32%

-20.00%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-43.62%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-59.54%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-67.14%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.50%

-6.26%

-13.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-16.63%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.30%

7.93%

+1.37%

Volatility

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 16.12% compared to SCOR SE (SCR.PA) at 6.21%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCR.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VRTSCR.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.12%

6.21%

+9.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.82%

17.29%

+28.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.29%

25.73%

+32.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.88%

35.38%

+26.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.61%

34.73%

+19.88%

Dividends

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than SCR.PA's 6.12% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCR.PA
SCOR SE		6.12%6.26%7.61%5.29%8.38%6.56%0.00%4.68%4.19%4.92%4.57%4.06%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.		0.07%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VRT vs. SCR.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and SCOR SE. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

Please note, different currencies. VRT values in USD, SCR.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions

VRT and SCR.PA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and SCR.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer