VRT vs. NGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and NGD.TO (New Gold Inc.) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while NGD.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. NGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VRT is traded in USD, while NGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the NGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

VRT

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: -19.50%
• YTD: 86.99%
• 6M: 87.85%
• 1Y: 173.26%
• 3Y*: 138.33%
• 5Y*: 63.29%
• 10Y*: —

NGD.TO

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. NGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	86.99%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%
NGD.TO New Gold Inc.	1.41%	249.08%	72.38%	47.88%	-33.82%	-32.47%	149.40%	14.23%	-38.57%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and NGD.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRT : $118.76B NGD.TO : CA$9.63B
EPS VRT : $3.99 NGD.TO : $1.09
PE Ratio VRT : 75.98 NGD.TO : 7.99
PEG Ratio VRT : 0.33 NGD.TO : 0.01
PS Ratio VRT : 10.92 NGD.TO : 4.65
PB Ratio VRT : 27.98 NGD.TO : 3.61
Total Revenue (TTM) VRT : $10.84B NGD.TO : $1.49B
Gross Profit (TTM) VRT : $3.92B NGD.TO : $767.09M
EBITDA (TTM) VRT : $2.35B NGD.TO : $810.05M

Return for Risk

VRT vs. NGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

NGD.TO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. NGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and New Gold Inc. (NGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRT	NGD.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.85	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.79	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VRT	NGD.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.50%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.30%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VRT	NGD.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.12%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.29%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.88%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.61%	—	—

Dividends

VRT vs. NGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, while NGD.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
NGD.TO New Gold Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRT and NGD.TO in my portfolio?

VRT and NGD.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.