PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRT vs. GOOGL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VRT vs. GOOGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 49.17% return, which is significantly higher than GOOGL's 13.93% return.


VRT

1D
6.18%
1M
-22.43%
6M
29.81%
YTD
49.17%
1Y
66.09%
3Y*
109.07%
5Y*
53.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
49.54%

GOOGL

1D
6.73%
1M
-1.41%
6M
5.50%
YTD
13.93%
1Y
86.11%
3Y*
39.78%
5Y*
21.67%
10Y*
24.55%
ALL TIME*
25.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.74B$10.31B$11.78B
$1.93B$1.68B$1.97B

VRT vs. GOOGL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
49.17%42.80%136.82%251.81%-45.25%33.80%69.36%12.55%1.03%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
13.93%65.99%36.01%58.32%-39.09%65.30%30.85%28.18%-16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and GOOGL is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018

0.33

The correlation between VRT and GOOGL shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VRT:

$93.00B

GOOGL:

$4.31T

EPS

VRT:

$4.42

GOOGL:

$19.94

PE Ratio

VRT:

54.63

GOOGL:

17.86

PEG Ratio

VRT:

0.24

GOOGL:

0.88

PS Ratio

VRT:

8.24

GOOGL:

9.78

PB Ratio

VRT:

19.94

GOOGL:

7.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

VRT:

$11.48B

GOOGL:

$445.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VRT:

$4.31B

GOOGL:

$271.59B

EBITDA (TTM)

VRT:

$2.52B

GOOGL:

$325.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRT vs. GOOGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRT
VRT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOGL
GOOGL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
GOOGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOGL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOGL Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRT vs. GOOGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRTGOOGLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

4.11

-2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

11.67

-6.09

VRT vs. GOOGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 1.03, which is lower than the GOOGL Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and GOOGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRT vs. GOOGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than GOOGL's maximum drawdown of -65.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and GOOGL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTGOOGLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.24%

-65.29%

-5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.70%

-21.05%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-29.81%

-31.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.24%

-44.32%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.78%

-11.49%

-24.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-13.01%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.00%

7.41%

+4.59%

Volatility

VRT vs. GOOGL - Volatility Comparison

Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 24.48% compared to Alphabet Inc. Class A (GOOGL) at 13.03%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTGOOGLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.48%

13.03%

+11.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.93%

24.79%

+28.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.52%

32.12%

+32.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.43%

31.92%

+31.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

55.31%

29.43%

+25.88%

Dividends

VRT vs. GOOGL - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than GOOGL's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.24%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VRT
Vertiv Holdings Co.
0.09%0.11%0.10%0.05%0.07%0.04%0.05%

Financials

VRT vs. GOOGL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Alphabet Inc. Class A. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

VRT vs. GOOGL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Alphabet Inc. Class A over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 1.23B and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

GOOGL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a gross profit of 73.85B and revenue of 119.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 637.90M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.5%.

GOOGL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported an operating income of 40.77B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.0%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 497.80M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 15.2%.

GOOGL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Alphabet Inc. Class A reported a net income of 112.19B and revenue of 119.80B, resulting in a net margin of 93.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VRT and GOOGL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRT has higher volatility (24.48%) compared to GOOGL (13.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs GOOGL's -65.29%.

GOOGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRT and GOOGL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer