VRT vs. CCH.L
VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and CCH.L (Coca Cola HBC AG) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while CCH.L operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 63.29%/yr vs 14.37%/yr for CCH.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRT vs. CCH.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VRT is traded in USD, while CCH.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CCH.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 86.99% return, which is significantly higher than CCH.L's 21.78% return.
VRT
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -19.50%
- YTD
- 86.99%
- 6M
- 87.85%
- 1Y
- 173.26%
- 3Y*
- 138.33%
- 5Y*
- 63.29%
- 10Y*
- —
CCH.L
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 9.86%
- YTD
- 21.78%
- 6M
- 27.45%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 30.92%
- 5Y*
- 14.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
VRT vs. CCH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 86.99% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 21.78% | 54.77% | 20.11% | 26.42% | -28.26% | 9.16% | -1.77% | 15.54% | -12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRT and CCH.L is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.13 |
The correlation between VRT and CCH.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VRT:
$118.76B
CCH.L:
£16.70B
VRT:
$3.99
CCH.L:
€4.84
VRT:
75.98
CCH.L:
10.98
VRT:
0.33
CCH.L:
0.61
VRT:
10.92
CCH.L:
0.86
VRT:
27.98
CCH.L:
5.03
VRT:
$10.84B
CCH.L:
€22.35B
VRT:
$3.92B
CCH.L:
€8.14B
VRT:
$2.35B
CCH.L:
€3.00B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRT vs. CCH.L — Risk / Return Rank
VRT
CCH.L
VRT vs. CCH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRT | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.55 | 0.88 | +5.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.79 | 1.72 | +16.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRT vs. CCH.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, which is greater than CCH.L's maximum drawdown of -52.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and CCH.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRT | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -52.49% | -18.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.32% | -19.11% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -20.00% | -41.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.24% | -50.65% | -20.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.50% | -3.79% | -15.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -17.86% | +1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 9.75% | -0.45% |
Volatility
VRT vs. CCH.L - Volatility Comparison
Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) has a higher volatility of 16.12% compared to Coca Cola HBC AG (CCH.L) at 5.60%. This indicates that VRT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRT | CCH.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 5.60% | +10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.82% | 17.28% | +28.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.29% | 23.56% | +34.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.88% | 26.29% | +35.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.61% | 28.19% | +26.42% |
Dividends
VRT vs. CCH.L - Dividend Comparison
VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than CCH.L's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCH.L Coca Cola HBC AG | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.96% | 2.94% | 3.60% | 2.50% | 2.35% | 6.99% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.88% | 1.76% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VRT vs. CCH.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Coca Cola HBC AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VRT vs. CCH.L - Profitability Comparison
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
CCH.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 5.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
CCH.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported an operating income of 654.01M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.9%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
CCH.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca Cola HBC AG reported a net income of 469.16M and revenue of 5.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VRT and CCH.L have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VRT and CCH.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer