RCMT vs. FERG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RCMT (RCM Technologies, Inc.) and FERG (Ferguson plc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RCMT in Engineering & Construction, FERG in Industrial Distribution. Over the past 10 years, RCMT returned 17.27%/yr vs 17.81%/yr for FERG. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RCMT vs. FERG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) and Ferguson plc (FERG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCMT achieves a 12.06% return, which is significantly higher than FERG's 3.42% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RCMT having a 17.27% annualized return and FERG not far ahead at 17.81%.

RCMT

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -26.71%
• YTD: 12.06%
• 6M: 18.15%
• 1Y: 0.13%
• 3Y*: 10.28%
• 5Y*: 43.77%
• 10Y*: 17.27%

FERG

• 1D: 1.44%
• 1M: -13.54%
• YTD: 3.42%
• 6M: -8.74%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 17.61%
• 5Y*: 12.64%
• 10Y*: 17.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCMT vs. FERG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RCMT RCM Technologies, Inc.	12.06%	-7.74%	-23.69%	135.33%	73.31%	243.96%	-31.00%	-3.23%	-50.40%	13.89%
FERG Ferguson plc	3.42%	29.90%	-8.62%	55.10%	-27.17%	56.42%	33.97%	49.90%	-14.35%	23.91%

Correlation

The correlation between RCMT and FERG is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2010	0.10

The correlation between RCMT and FERG shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap RCMT : $174.45M FERG : $44.34B
EPS RCMT : $2.11 FERG : $10.54
PE Ratio RCMT : 10.88 FERG : 21.59
PEG Ratio RCMT : 0.38 FERG : 1.95
PS Ratio RCMT : 0.55 FERG : 1.41
PB Ratio RCMT : 3.94 FERG : 7.55
Total Revenue (TTM) RCMT : $317.97M FERG : $31.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) RCMT : $87.99M FERG : $9.72B
EBITDA (TTM) RCMT : $26.19M FERG : $2.75B

Return for Risk

RCMT vs. FERG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCMT

RCMT Risk / Return Rank: 40
RCMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
RCMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
RCMT Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RCMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RCMT Martin Ratio Rank: 40

FERG

FERG Risk / Return Rank: 67
FERG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FERG Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FERG Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FERG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FERG Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCMT vs. FERG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) and Ferguson plc (FERG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCMT	FERG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.00	0.87	-0.87
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	1.54	-1.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.00	1.49	-1.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.00	3.83	-3.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCMT vs. FERG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCMT Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the FERG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCMT and FERG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCMT	FERG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00	0.87	-0.87
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.42	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.57	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.13	0.59	-0.45

Drawdowns

RCMT vs. FERG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCMT drawdown since its inception was -97.05%, which is greater than FERG's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCMT and FERG.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCMT	FERG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.05%	-55.35%	-41.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.16%	-18.32%	-17.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-53.15%	-32.92%	-20.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.14%	-43.31%	-19.83%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-82.66%	-55.35%	-27.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.20%	-14.66%	-13.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-64.93%	-9.81%	-55.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.25%	7.11%	+13.14%

Volatility

RCMT vs. FERG - Volatility Comparison

RCM Technologies, Inc. (RCMT) has a higher volatility of 25.07% compared to Ferguson plc (FERG) at 7.20%. This indicates that RCMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FERG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCMT	FERG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.07%	7.20%	+17.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.00%	21.60%	+23.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.27%	33.16%	+20.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.85%	30.04%	+33.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.26%	31.52%	+34.74%

Dividends

RCMT vs. FERG - Dividend Comparison

RCMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FERG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FERG Ferguson plc	1.90%	1.12%	1.84%	1.57%	2.76%	2.34%	2.33%	2.43%	3.75%	3.52%	1.11%	0.00%
RCMT RCM Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	16.00%	0.00%	18.18%

Financials

RCMT vs. FERG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between RCM Technologies, Inc. and Ferguson plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

RCMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.02M and revenue of 83.04M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.5%.

FERG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a gross profit of 2.32B and revenue of 7.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.

RCMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.94M and revenue of 83.04M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.2%.

FERG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported an operating income of 612.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

RCMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, RCM Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 3.84M and revenue of 83.04M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.

FERG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ferguson plc reported a net income of 414.00M and revenue of 7.47B, resulting in a net margin of 5.5%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCMT and FERG in my portfolio?

RCMT and FERG have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCMT or FERG?

RCMT has higher volatility (25.07%) compared to FERG (7.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCMT dropped -97.05% vs FERG's -55.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FERG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.