VRP vs. QPFF
VRP (Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. VRP is passively managed, while QPFF is actively managed. VRP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
VRP vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VRP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 2.32%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.76%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- 5.23%
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VRP vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 1.10% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
VRP vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRP
QPFF
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Technology
-
-
Financial Services
VRP
QPFF
Utilities
VRP
QPFF
Energy
VRP
QPFF
-
Communication Services
VRP
QPFF
Real Estate
VRP
QPFF
Healthcare
VRP
QPFF
-
Industrials
VRP
QPFF
Consumer Cyclical
VRP
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
VRP
QPFF
-
Basic Materials
VRP
QPFF
Technology
VRP
-
QPFF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRP vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
VRP
QPFF
VRP vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF (VRP) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VRP | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VRP | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | — | — |
Drawdowns
VRP vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRP drawdown since its inception was -46.04%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRP and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRP | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.04% | 0.00% | -46.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | 0.00% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | 0.00% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility
VRP vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRP | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88% | 0.00% | +2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 0.00% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 0.00% | +14.53% |
VRP vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRP vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
VRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VRP Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF | 6.30% | 6.53% | 5.78% | 6.61% | 5.38% | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.71% | 5.28% | 4.69% | 5.10% | 5.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VRP.
VRP has the higher dividend yield at 6.30%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for VRP and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for VRP and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer